Our Publications
Electronic versions are provided as a professional courtesy to ensure timely dissemination of academic work for individual, noncommercial purposes. Copyright and all rights therein reside with the respective copyright holders, as stated within each paper. These files may not be reposted without permission.
Recent Publications
Kalra, P.B., Binzak, J.V., Matthews, P.G. & Hubbard, E.M. (2020, in press). Symbolic fractions elicit an analog magnitude representation in school-age children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Binzak, J.V. & Hubbard, E.M. (2020). No calculation necessary: Accessing rational magnitudes through fraction notation. Cognition, 199: 104219 org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104219
Toomarian, E.Y., Meng, R. & Hubbard, E.M. (2019). Individual differences in implicit and explicit spatial processing of fractions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10:596. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00596
Cochrane, A.*, Cui, L.*, Hubbard, E.M. & Green, C. S. (2019). Long-term training of the approximate number system. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 81(3):621–636. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-01636-w *Co-first authors.
Toomarian, E.Y. & Hubbard, E.M. (2018). On the genesis of spatial-numerical associations: Evolutionary and cultural factors co-construct the mental number line. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 90:184–199 doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.04.010
Toomarian, E.Y. & Hubbard, E.M. (2018). The fractions SNARC revisited: Processing Fractions on a Consistent Mental Number Line. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(8) 1761–1770 10.1080/17470218.2017.1350867
Sidney, P.G., Thompson, C.A., Matthews, P.G. & Hubbard, E.M. (2017). From continuous magnitudes to symbolic numbers: The centrality of ratio. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40:e190 doi:10.1017/S0140525X16002284
Foundational Articles
Matthews P.G. & Hubbard EM. (2017). Making space for spatial proportions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(6):644-647. DOI: 10.1177/0022219416679133
Matthews, P.M., Lewis, M.R. & Hubbard, E.M. (2016). Individual differences in nonsymbolic ratio processing predict symbolic math performance. Psychological Science, 27(2):191-202. doi:10.1177/0956797615617799
Lewis, M.R., Matthews, P.M. & Hubbard, E.M. (2015). Neurocognitive Architectures and the Nonsymbolic Foundations of Fractions Understanding. In D.B. Berch, D.C. Geary, and K.M. Koepke (Eds.) Development of Mathematical Cognition-Neural Substrates and Genetic Influences. (p. 141-160) Elsevier. ISBN: 978-0128018712.